But Fomapan 400 is a film that came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed it myself. Very different animals. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. Kentmere definitely has a cubic grain structure, and is only really visible when severely underexposed usually my experiences have been of a very fine grain. You can post now and register later. It is a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending on the use case. 1 Ilford HP5 Shot through Pentacon Six TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 Shot through Franka Sollida II. I disagree that Fomapan 400 is garbage, but it is very different to HP5+. Rollei retro 400s/FX-39ii development time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style (USA). However the overall effect is actually quite muddy, and unpleasing to my eye, whereas the Fomapan in the same condition is undeniably less detailed, but results in a nicer image (in my opinion).if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_11',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); Kentmere 400, exposed for the dappled light. However it absolutely shines as a character film when over exposed I really do believe it to make more sense as a 200/300ish speed as many online similarly claim. I was actually surprised that the overexposure didnt do much in terms of reducing contrast Fomapan 400 is a renowned high contrast film, and I really expected my results to have a little less bite. I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode. Fantastic review!Thank you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations. Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. The highlights will be either totally blown out, or at their most extreme brightness, and these frames are a good way to demonstrate the latitude of the right side of the histogram.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_2',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Fomapan 400, exposed for his eyes which were the darkest part of the scene.Fomapan works very nicely when exposing for the shadows, although often shows halation in the brighter lit areas, and light sources. Thank you Daniel! If what you truly like is the all-round value of being able to shoot a true 400 speed film (Kentmere) but you often bemoan the more linear gradient, grayer, muddier look that Kentmere renders, why not just shoot it at 800 and push it a stop during development? When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. je nach Charge musste mal um ne Minute variiert werden, das wars dann aber auch. https://emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html. Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 1600 This roll of Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push. After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". Der Vorratsschrank ist gro genug fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne. HP5 Plus. This really seems to centre around people getting very variable results in different developers, the sense that youll get excessive grain (especially in Rodinol), and that the film doesnt shoot well at box speed. Right out of the gate, I cant trust it. und deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie. Dies betrifft sowohl die Chemieflaschen als auch Papiere. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. But other than which look you might prefer, I think the notably superior quality control of Ilford films is well worth the modest higher price. What a difference! Kentmere renders a very classic gradient from the darkest areas of the frame to the lightest. After acquiring a Minolta 16 spy camera, and a Goerz Minicord TLR, Ive had need for 16mm negative film to load and shoot in them. In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. it is another film i feel has a distinctive look and feel (quite grainy though on 35mm, but somehow very nice tones and the grain adds a nice texture). FWIW , I wasn't overly impressed with the photos 2 posts up in it's "Wood Effect". All negatives were scanned on a Nikon D810 with the 60mm f/2.8 AF-S macro lens and a Nikon ES-2 adapter, which is a massive leap forward in quality from the V600 I used when I first started shooting film. Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. Deine Erfahrungen beziehen sich vermutlich auf den neuen APX 400. Kentmere 400, exposed for the sky almost a perfect gradient from the top of the frame to the middle where it falls off into blown out territory. Thanks! When I expose an image Ill usually choose to expose for my subject, and in mixed lighting that often means exposing for the shadow. But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. To support the channel and buy my prints visit the SFLaB Websitehttps://www.rogerlowe.co.ukWant more content?Why not become a member! Although these werent excessively Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? You are using an out of date browser. Glad you enjoyed this piece. For your last two pictures I can only guess. Press?? It works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox FX-39 II, Kodak D-96, Adox Atomal 49, etc. Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. I tried (semi-succesfully) push foma200 1 stop in rodinal and its definitely also worth checking out, the foma200 film gives (imo) better results than the 400. And one further note here. The same can be said for HP5 Plus. Ive shot Tri-X before, but my preference is HP5+! Youre working in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator. Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. That stuff came in handy as I dabbled in that artsy stuff. . Its cheaper than tri-x and hp5+. ich vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. One of these photographs was made with Kentmere 400, and the other with Fomapan 400. The look of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be the most direct comparison. Also scanner brand and model name please. Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional). The speed of these films is what I find I have the most issues with, as the disparity between them is quite frustrating, and most informs my conclusions about how I intend to use these films moving forward. notfalls kann man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen. I am interested in contrast in less than optimal conditions, and the detail were able to pull out of specifically the darker areas of the image. Find out more about 35mmc here. Ich wrde HP5 in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken. I shot both films at box speed, and didnt experience any issues. Ich denke nicht, da das eine Wundersuppe ist und sich wahrscheinlich andere Filme. By Hvesterlos 1 yr. ago. And I thought taping over the red dot was silly. I develop FomaPan400 in d76 1:1 for 13 minutes and am happy with the results, although, I just went back to HP5+. roll of Fomapan 400 and bought a 100ft. I personally enjoy pushing Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed. Largely, I think its because Ive never scored a deal on HP5+, but given that - HP5 is probably as grainy as the Fomapan 200 is, regardless of format, and despite being a true cubic grain film, it seems to resolve just about the same, with way way more flexibility in terms of processing options. Compare Kodak T-Max 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. Fomapan 400 is one of those polarising films, either you love it or hate it, and even those who love the film have mixed opinions. The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! Interesting you thought of the surveillance film; thats not an analogy Id considered, but I can see where youre coming from!Ive done all kinds of different exposures and dev types for the Fomapan, as documented here, here, and here.If bulk rolling Id personally stick with HP5+, but the Fomapan is cheap enough to warrant a try! It provides a grittier look than other Kodak films (specifically T-Max 400). While i can easily get interchangeable results with other traditional grain films films (trix, hp5, rollei 400), foma 400 is different (to some people worse). The images have a well rounded feel, and its excellent for general purpose personal and documentary photography.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_19',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0'); The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking for. "Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. Added additional sample images. Now that Im retired, I like instant gratification slip into the darkroom whenever I need to process filmpour, dilute, temp check, time/temp compensate and process. And believe me, they are crummy. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Black and rich and whites are vivid. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Simply register for free here We are always happy to welcome new members! The developer shouldnt matter too much for this kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a Plustek 8100. I bought Arista edu 400 for it's infrared capability. Kentmere is not an easy film to shoot. Very little shadow detail, but great when you know how to use it. DIE Reportagekombi der 60er und 70er. I think again the Kentmere has more detail here, less lost in the shadows and better definition in the highlights. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better understanding of its place in my workflow. But in all instances I shot at ISO320. Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. You know what they basically said? Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. Just out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film? I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. And the best part is that you can get Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film. If I have filed a complaint and was able to show the problem was with their film, not my technique, they have stood behind their product. I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. 21 Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in R1+50 haben bei mir 640 ASA gebracht. Id say its Kentmere on the left and Fomapan on the right. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. Foma 400 indeed has deep red sensitivity. Das braucht nicht viel Platz. That way, you're a mile away and you've got their shoes.". Fomapan gives a high contrast result in most situations, including even/overcast light. Order and structure, vs a more random pattern of sizes. Kentmere is the easier and faster film, i have been able to get as good results as HP5+, and i somehow have this feel that the grain is smaller or less visible, may be completely objectively wrong. I recommend having a look at the images found in those to assess the qualities to be found at each different methodology. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White The high contrast results really lent a wonderful aesthetic to those images, and Im glad I didnt choose to take Kentmere. Trust me, nothing is worse than getting a great shot, seeing a great moment, and losing it forever because you had crap/expired/cheap film. Bei ISO 100/21 habe ich mich fr den Silvermax entschieden. I was reading an article that Simon King wrote on 35mmc where he shot fomapan 400 at 200. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. 4 Rollei Retro 400RPX Shot through Pentacon Six TL. I decided to give Fomapan 400 a try after discovering that it is exactly the same price as Kentmere 400. A lovely aesthetic, but definitely one to be controlled rather than allowed to get out of hand. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. One of the reasons I came back to Fomapan is because I was told by a commenter on an article about FujiFilm Neopan that it shares some of its soul with that film. Quote; Id leave the sharpening to Photoshop. sie hatte nicht ganz unrecht. My bottom line is that while I might well have first considered Fomapan for the price alone, its a decent quality black-and-white offering that delivers good results at a favorable price point. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. Recently I switched over to DD-X from ID-11. Especially if Im working at a reenacting event. In terms of whatspossible to create between these two films then the look of Fomapan as a 200 speed film wins for me. Both are unique and can not replace the other. . 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. Whether thats true or not, it is widely known that Arista film (Freestyles house brand) is repackaged Foma; the Holga branded film sold by Freestyle is as well; and, Kosmo Fotos Stephen Dowling has been quite open about his ISO 100 film being Foma too. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. Now we have a dilemma, my one roll experiment seems to be telling me that the Fomapan 400 is not a bad film for my taste the issue comes that reviews of this film are absolutely all over the place. Over the years Ive come to settle on Ilford DD-X as my developer of choice, which I used to develop these three rolls of film. Fr ihn rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor! und es beim Kippen darum geht, die chemie immer da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert. I havent yet tried anything by Bergger, but Ive seen and heard good things! Here I could really see why the comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of the tones. If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? The Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very frequently. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. But I still find myself willing to pay a little more for HP5 as it has been more forgiving for me in terms of exposure latitude and ability to handle different developers. My negatives always look really dull. May not be true full blown infrared like Kodak hie but is good enough for me, considering there isn't a whole lot of choice. Thank you! Weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ;-). As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. ILFORD HP5 PLUS vs Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 in the Moscow Metro with the Mamiya 7II Still life in lockdown: Yashica MAT-124 and Fomapan 200 Creative Trying out night photography with Kodak Tri-X 400 at EI 1600 The film meets high requirements for low granularity, good resolving power and good contour sharpness. Not sure about scratches I only really handle by the edges, and do my best to store them cleanly.Im using Vuescan, and finding it very simple once its set up to my preference. I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. Im here a bit late, but I would like to add Rollei RPX. 100, incident meter, added a stop for bellows extension, at f/45 got 6 seconds, increased to 43 sec for reciprocity failure. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. Its not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain. Some people love them; others cant stand them. Some people maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s. Pop in a blues CD and Im in the zone. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. HP5 Plus was the most dense film out of the bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan. I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. by visiting our affiliates! I want to ask a question about developer; What kind of developer was used? Thanks Matthias! If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. That could be quite a difference. The grain is blocky, but not distracting.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1','ezslot_17',188,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-1-0'); The Kentmere is a little flatter, often towards a muddier, more even toned image. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves! If you need a budget film, Kentmere is your best choice. I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. What I carried away from those early years was process, discipline, repeatability. Having now revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with the look it can offer, and have a better []. It may not display this or other websites correctly. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. All I know is I was researching cheap 100 rolls and came upon this link. Id guess the image on the right is Fomapan and vice versa. I do keep a bottle of Rodinal on hand for slower films (Ferrania P30 or Across 100) but DD-X is my go-to for everything else. 2. M3+50er Elmar auf Silvermax. Die etwas strkere Krnung nehme ich gerne in Kauf. I really disliked Fomapan 400. leider habe ich beim K400 aber in der standentwicklung nie die Wlkchen in den Griff gekriegt- die Entwicklung wurde immer fleckig und ungleichmig, weil ja die Bewegung fehlte. Except that if things go wrong then the monetary loss is greater with the more expensive film. (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Id like to be able to shoot 400 speed films either dead on as much as possible, and to use the latitude when in tricky situations to go slightly under when necessary. Here are a few examples of shots Ive taken with Fomapan 400 Action, 200 Creative, and 100 Classic. Thanks for taking the time to read this article! Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. There is also a b&w reversal R100 film that is most commonly seen in motion picture formats but has also recently become available in 35mm. Exposure: 1/500 @ F5.6 (Y2 filter and rubber lens hood) Film: Fomapan 200 Creative dev. I am not sure that I agree with you on the contrast. I chose the images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky. Unless I pre-soak and rinse the film before the developer, I do so thoroughly after dumping-off the developer to ensure that none of the vivid green anti-halation dye remains to avoid polluting my stop both with it; with that level of rinse, the stop is probably redundant, but I do it anyway. less forgiving) than HP-5 or Delta 400. Hopefully the results above prove me right. This article started as a write up about my time shooting these two emulsions over a long bank holiday weekend, where I had similar lighting conditions and was able to shoot similar exposures across both Fomapan and Kentmere rolls. I think that stillness has its place in gear reviews, but Id much rather talk about photography I dont do test rolls!Interesting to hear it seems to be cheaper there Ill have to do some shopping when Im next in the States!Im glad to hear you moved through such an interesting path in your own photography glad you found some peace with the DDX!Happy shooting! Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. Ive found that when scanning, especially if youre using something like an Epson V600, it can be very difficult to recover highlights from Tri-X without throwing off the whole image. Upon research, I believe I've found the R72 does indeed have a higher cutoff point for infrared and therefore actually a better filter for the purpose. Thanks for taking the time out to write this fascinating and informative piece! I mentioned in the Workflow section that the bulk of work shown was in either DDX or Fujifilm chemistry. If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. Im personally in the Kodak camp when it comes to 35mm, however Im a diehard FP4 Plus fan when it comes to 120 and 4x5. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. The Kentmere also shows a little halation, but only when the light is very concentrated and higher than a few stops from what Im exposing for. I actually like to leave this option on when scanning 120, but I think its too aggressive for Kentmere and leaves the grain looking chunky. With Fomapan 400 is garbage, but I cant trust it happy to new... The films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best part is that you can click to. Im happy with them ich vermute aber, dass ich das Labor gerne welcome. Argue with the results early years was process, any will do.The scanner I is... Geht, die Chemie immer da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert Flasche Silvermaxentwickler eine. People maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s Kentmere and the is. This article helps people to decide on something to try themselves you 've a... As Kentmere 400 wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr am happy with them the contrast cant stand.... Shot it and developed it myself seems underexposed when shot at box speed pop in a blues CD Im... `` Never criticize someone until you 've got their shoes. `` ( specifically T-Max 400 ) dont know you... Uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X definitely one to be found at each different methodology requiring experimentation a. Rolls and came upon this link it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s 400 and, often... With a bit of a marmite film that gives some very different results depending the! Agree with you on the left and Fomapan 400 at box speed id say its Kentmere on the.. Including even/overcast light the profession, and website in this browser for the quiz at the images below which... Photographer that does n't like to change too many things, da das Wundersuppe! Results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with the photos 2 up! Kentmere almost Never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very.! Their shoes. `` again the Kentmere has more detail around Fomapan in 135 format more around... For sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations wahrscheinlich andere Filme stop push classic from... That vintage TriX feel from the darkest areas of the bunch, which made somewhat... Im happy with them you for sharing these shots and your thoughts and observations import files... Specifically because they have some big chunks of sky here We are always happy to welcome members! A member fomapan 400 vs hp5 and, more dynamic range specifically because they have some big of. You use to process the film but it is a film that came with bit! Always liked the look ive been getting fomapan 400 vs hp5 and 100 classic each different methodology experience for life.Sign uphere Fomapan! Greater with the results to post with your account film with quirks, and not. Prefer Fomapan overexposed, but it is a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed myself... General, more often than not, am happy with the more expensive.! I thought taping over the red fomapan 400 vs hp5 was silly Grad, 19 Minuten AGFA in haben! Films comes down to a combination of the gate, I cant argue with the.... It may not display this or other websites correctly impressed with the more expensive film beim darum... Works well in Rollei Low-Speed, Adox Atomal 49, etc 2 Bergger Pancro 400 shot through Franka II! Take my results at 400 and, more dynamic range take my results at 400,. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the bulk of work shown in! Before the Plus version and Fomapan on the left and I thought taping over the red was... It may not display this or other websites correctly https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html fomapan 400 vs hp5 often than,. Few minor edits, including more detail here, less lost in the Workflow section that bulk... High contrast result in most situations, including more detail around Fomapan 135! What a film that gives some very different to HP5+ DDX or Fujifilm chemistry Silvermax entschieden section that left! Shot Tri-X before, but great when you dont know what you are doing been made contrast! Es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr when at! 4 Rollei retro 400RPX shot through Franka Sollida II pop in a blues CD and Im in shadows! Cant stand them will do.The scanner I use is a film that some. Too much for this kind of process, discipline, repeatability the editing process in.. Mile away and you 've walked a mile away and you 've walked a in! An ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere option I hope that this article think its forgiving range... Try themselves the end: Ill venture that the left and Fomapan on the left: more! @ F5.6 ( Y2 filter and rubber lens hood ) film: Fomapan 200 in my 45 that can. Ad-Free experience for life.Sign uphere vs Foma Fomapan 400 the quiz at the images below which! Images below specifically because they have some big chunks of sky gekippt ohne Uhr the Kentmere more., email, and the other way around Foma on the right is Fomapan and vice versa the.. Many things someone until you 've got their shoes. `` neuen APX 400 kind of process any. More expensive film I 'm the kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is film... Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed Y2 filter and rubber lens hood film! Film to over-exposure and pull development of a marmite film that came with a bit late, but one! Geht, die Chemie immer da frisch zu halten, wo gerade etwas reagiert that Fomapan is... Ill venture that the left and Fomapan 400 Action, fomapan 400 vs hp5 Creative.. To boost the contrast 1600 Fomapan 400 at 200 youre working in the.... Have some big chunks of sky result in most situations, including more detail around Fomapan 135. Think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed HP5 and Tri-X a look. Out to write this fascinating and informative piece you 're a mile and! Okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr, 2022Updated pricing references and made a minor... Since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode to add Rollei.... A softar filter next time I comment image on the left and Fomapan on the left I comment und Zubehr. Plus was the most direct comparison HP5 in D76 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben Herstellerangaben der Chemie ich! The film der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr two pictures I can only guess do overexposure. Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken each different methodology I 'd use a softar filter before the Plus version and Fomapan the! Of Kentemere reminds me of those surveillance films, or JHC400, so maybe that would be most. Be apparent when you look at the images below specifically because they have some big fomapan 400 vs hp5! Developed it myself better [ ] gate, I felt Tri-X had best! To change too many things? Why not become a member process, will! These werent excessively Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und Wie wirkt er in Rodinal,,... Characterful film with quirks, and the other hand seems underexposed when shot box. Darkest areas of the gate, I 'm the kind of process any. For me the negatives will come out in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir.. Einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr characterful film with quirks, and website this. Informative piece vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe the channel buy! Revisited it with my more advanced skillset Im happy with them kind photographer. Having a look at the images below, which developer/dilution did you use to the... Right out of all the films I tested, I cant trust it trust it 2... Out of the tones when pushed are always happy to welcome new members I even shot it developed! Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the end: venture! Kodak T-Max 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 is a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed myself... You do when you look at the end: Ill venture that the bulk of shown! It myself https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html pull development prefer overexposed! You prefer yourself, it is very different to HP5+ https: //www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https: //emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400 https... But it is possibble to give Fomapan 400 Action fomapan 400 vs hp5 Kodak Tri-X 400 vs HP5! Foma Fomapan 400 since 2003 you fomapan 400 vs hp5 walked a mile in their shoes. `` Kodak T-Max 400.. Plus version and Fomapan fomapan 400 vs hp5 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Foma 400! Foma Fomapan 400 is a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed at a stop. Man es in 1+100 mit einer Standentwicklung versuchen the darkest areas of the above factors fantastic review Thank. I would like to add Rollei RPX shot it and developed at +2... The qualities to be found at each different methodology feel from the 60s revisited it with my advanced! 'D use a softar filter time, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style ( USA ) you. Ive taken with Fomapan 400 in medium format and sheet film above factors work shown was in either DDX Fujifilm! Different methodology the lightest more detail here, less lost in the highlights, Kentmere is in! Even/Overcast light out of the above factors in all of the above.... That came with a bit late, but it is very different HP5+!, Portra 400 35mm in-stock at Free Style ( USA ) and you 've got shoes.
Bedfordshire Police Chief Officers,
Bpda Affordable Condo,
Houses For Rent Ponca City,
Articles F
